Simulate jurors in any venue in minutes

Build an AI mock jury that reacts to your documents, testimony, video, and exhibits, then ask any juror follow-up questions. Each juror is configured for your venue and has a distinct life story, imperfect memory, varying attention, and local context. Use the panel to test try-or-settle decisions, evaluate expert witnesses, and see which facts and themes resonate as the case develops.

Book a demo Published in DRI →
Patented method
Psychological layering is what makes our jurors act like people
Matched a live mock jury
Published head-to-head in DRI’s For The Defense, May 2026. Read it
Am Law 100 firms and top-10 insurers
Used on live matters and claims
SOC 2 Type II
Built for case material, never trained on your data

Upload your files and ask a question. A panel built for your venue answers in minutes.

Published evidence

A published head-to-head against a live mock jury, teams using it on live matters, and three decades of published research behind the method.

“We ran our materials through GPT and it gave the logical verdict. The Viewpoints jurors answered the way real people do, with the same inconsistencies, and matched what we saw in our live mock trial.”

Trial partner, Am Law 100 firm

“The simulated panel matched our mock jury and surfaced broader themes than we’d tested for.”

In-house trial counsel, top-10 U.S. insurer
Founded by Stanford-trained media psychologists
By researchers who spent their careers measuring how people react
36,000+ citations
Google Scholar, across the founding team
200+ published papers
In media psychology and human-computer interaction
Meet the team →
Stanford PhDs with decades of psychology experience

Put your case in front of the panel

Within the hour you have the three things a strategy memo needs: the themes that move the panel, the verdict curve, and every juror’s reasons.

Exhibit A · Which facts and themes move the panel, and in which direction?Dram shop case · 100 jurors
Dashboard chart ranking the case facts that pull jurors toward plaintiff or defense

Rank the strongest plaintiff and defense drivers. Change the closing, expert, claim, or exhibit and compare the new run with the baseline.

Exhibit B · Verdict and damages distribution10,000 simulated jury combinations
Dashboard chart of verdict outcomes across 10,000 jury runs, with the jury vote distribution

See the center of the distribution and the tail risk. Use the range to pressure-test reserves, authority, and settlement posture.

Exhibit C · Reason behind every voteJuror 2 of 12
Marcus, 54
Votes defense · moved three others

Trace a result back to the fact and reasoning that produced it.

“The worst injuries came from the crash afterward. That’s a separate event the bar didn’t cause.”

Every vote comes with the juror’s reasoning in their own words, ready for the strategy memo. And you can follow-up with Marcus 1:1 or put him in a focus group to get the why behind his answers.

Exhibit D · What changed between versionsIllustrative rerun comparison

Change the argument. See what moved.

Compare the baseline with a revised case presentation to see vote movement, damages shift, and which themes gained or lost pull.

Vote movement
6–6Baseline
9–3Revision
Median damages
$1.2MBaseline
$760KRevision
Theme movement
Intervening crash38→67
Duty to stop service61→44
Plaintiff credibility52→49

Illustrative worked example. A live rerun compares the outputs from your own matter, venue, panel configuration, and revised materials.

See the full jury product →

Build the panel for the venue you’re facing

Configure the pool using available venue and demographic data, then draw panels across age, education, occupation, income, and modeled life experience.

Simulated juror
Harris County, Texas · pool of 1,300 Panel of 12 drawn from the configured pool

What’s inside a simulated juror

Ask a chatbot about your case and it gives you the logical answer. Juries are not logical machines. Each of our jurors is an individual LLM that carries the layers that shape a real verdict, so panels disagree, dig in, and surprise you the way real ones do.

LayerIn plain termsWhy it matters in court
A life story A full biography: family, work, money, health, and past brushes with the legal system Two jurors with identical demographics can hear the same fact in opposite ways
Attitudes Views on corporations, lawsuits, money, and personal responsibility Attitudes toward corporations, lawsuits, money, and responsibility affect how jurors interpret the same evidence
How they process Some read every page. Some skim and react to what catches their eye Your best exhibit only works on jurors who take it in
How firmly they hold on Some jurors move in deliberation. Some never do Holdouts and lead voices decide close cases
The news they follow Current headlines and local sentiment, refreshed like a real pool’s Attitudes about verdicts and damages shift with the news cycle

A life story

  • Grew up over her parents’ diner
  • Two kids, a mortgage, a night class
  • Sued once over a busted pipe, settled

Her psychology

  • Fairness first, rules a close second
  • Tunes out jargon, trusts photographs
  • Digs in when she feels pushed

The news she follows

  • Local TV and a county Facebook group
  • Saw the coverage of last month’s big verdict
  • Gas prices, groceries, insurance rates
9 to 3 for the defense
and every juror can tell you why

See how opinions change in deliberation

Group twelve simulated jurors into a panel. Follow who reframes the dispute, which arguments spread, and where holdouts remain. Use the exchange to generate questions and pressure-test strategy, not as a transcript of what a real jury will say.

Foreman
Patricia, 58
Marcus, 54
Tess, 29
Sam, 45
Anna, 61
Holdout
Ray, 67
Kai, 38
Layla, 45
Luca, 29
Clara, 72
Rowan, 41
Gia, 24
One persuasive juror moved three votes. Marcus reframed the crash as an intervening cause and the panel went from 6–6 to 9–3.

FAQ

How is this different from other legal AI?

Most legal AI reviews documents, drafts contracts, or researches precedent. Viewpoints.ai models how people decide. It shows how jurors in your venue react to your story, your evidence, and your arguments, and which themes drive their votes.

Should I trust the verdict and damages numbers?

Use the numbers as decision support, not a prediction guarantee. In the published DRI comparison, the verdict direction matched and the damages estimates differed. The most useful outputs are the themes behind votes, ranges, comparisons between case versions, and deliberation dynamics.

Can the jurors really deliberate with each other?

Group twelve simulated jurors into a panel. Follow who reframes the dispute, which arguments spread, and where holdouts remain. Use the exchange to generate questions and pressure-test strategy, not as a transcript of what a real jury will say.

Can I simulate a jury for a specific jurisdiction?

Configure the pool using available venue and demographic data, then draw panels across age, education, occupation, income, and modeled life experience.

How is case data handled?

Viewpoints.ai is SOC 2 Type II audited and uses strict access controls. For supported enterprise configurations, zero-data-retention arrangements cover AI providers, and case files are not used to train Viewpoints models. Data handling depends on your configuration and agreement, so confirm requirements with our team before submitting sensitive material.

What materials can I use?

Use the materials you would use to explain the matter to a mock jury: pleadings, briefs, transcripts, witness summaries, exhibits, photographs, claim documents, and video. Start with the materials that matter to the decision; our team will help organize them before launch.

How long does a full matter take?

Once your materials are gathered, launching a matter usually takes about 15 to 30 minutes. Most of that time is choosing the question, venue, and files. Gathering and reviewing the materials happens beforehand and varies by matter.

Bring your case. We’ll bring the jury

We’ll build a panel matched to your venue for one of your live matters, then walk through the verdict, the themes behind it, and an interview with any juror you choose.

Book a demo